Senate kills the CLARITY Act 49-50. SEC and CFTC write crypto rules anyway

The single-piece route to crypto market structure closed on September 15, when the Senate rejected the CLARITY Act on a 49-50 cloture vote. The SEC and CFTC did not stop there; within days both agencies said they will move crypto rulemaking forward under their existing authority, and analysts at Bernstein sketched which rules they expect first.

What the CLARITY Act would have done was hand the industry one clean statutory framework for digital assets, settling which tokens are securities and which fall under the CFTC, and how exchanges and brokers treat them. Its rejection appears to have flipped the sequence rather than ending it. Per CoinCentral, both agencies said they will move ahead under powers they already hold; Bernstein analysts expect that push to be aggressive and swift, trading the broad bill for a step-by-step route.

Two days later, SEC Chair Paul Atkins vowed to act decisively within the agency's statutory authority, and CFTC Chair Mike Selig said his agency is locked in and ready to ship its rules. Where that promise leads is still expectation rather than action. A Bernstein note published this week lists what it expects first: token taxonomy rules for raising capital, developer protections for DeFi and self-custodial protocols, and innovation exemptions for equity tokenization. No such exemption has been issued yet. The SEC's last concrete step was a proposed framework for crypto investment contracts on August 19, with a safe harbor that would shield certain tokens from being classified as investment contracts.

The trade-off is real and runs both ways. A statutory framework died with the CLARITY Act, which is why the agencies are choosing an incremental path at all. Rulemaking-by-rulemaking is slower, it is venue-specific, and it leaves a patchwork that can lag the growth of ETFs and onchain products. It also concentrates discretion in the agencies: the same aggressive posture behind the promised rulemaking could turn punitive toward a venue or product the regulators see as a problem, and a tokenized-venue or prediction-market failure could feed a CFTC enforcement pushback. Fragmentation over a single statute is the residual cost of the political impasse.

What to watch next is which rules the agencies actually propose first, whether the CFTC follows with its own set, and whether their patchwork keeps pace with the products already launching. The coming proposals are the first test of how far agency authority can stretch where Congress would not go.

Sources: CoinCentral, September 17.

This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.